How Far Back Does Speedway Background Check Go? [Fact Checked!]

In the wake of the recent mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, politicians and advocacy groups have called for tougher gun laws, while the National Rifle Association called for “common sense” gun control. The debate over firearms and their regulation has triggered a national conversation about race and history in relation to gun violence.

The roots of this national dialogue can be traced to the year 1911. At the time, an armed confrontation between a gang of African Americans and a group of white people in Georgia over a black man’s right to vote led to the so-called “Halls Rebellion.” It lasted for a week, and during that time, more than 50 people were killed. Some of the victims were civilians, including women and children. It was ultimately put down by the Georgia National Guard. The rebellion and the massacre it commemorated became known as the “Hallsville Massacre,” and it remains the bloodiest instance of civil disobedience in American history.

What Is The Difference Between The 1911 And 2017 Revolutions?

While both the 1911 and 2017 uprisings were catalyzed by an armed rebellion against the government, their underlying causes were highly contrasting. In the case of the African Americans who led the revolt in Georgia, their demands were quite modest. They simply wanted the right to vote. Their demands did not extend to any other aspect of life in the state. In fact, their demands were so limited that the white community in Georgia at the time actually endorsed their cause.

In comparison, the main demand of the Ohio and Texas shootings this year was for the government to intervene and regulate the sale of firearms. The El Paso gunman’s manifesto explicitly mentioned that the shootings were motivated by the fear that Democrats would take away his right to “self-defense.”

Who Were The Main Participants In The 1911 And 2017 Revolutions?

The main participants in the 1911 and the 2017 uprisings were, respectively, blacks and Latinx. In the case of the former, their ancestors had been enslaved and marginalized in Georgia for over 150 years. In fact, after the Civil War, many African Americans in the state were still denied the right to vote. Not until 1965 did Georgia finally grant black citizens the franchise.

In the case of the later, the roots of the current gun violence epidemic can be traced to the 1980s when the crack cocaine epidemic began to ravage inner cities. With dealers often operating from within a quarter-mile of schools, many black and Latinx communities were terrorized in their communities. In turn, this created an environment where gun violence was normalized. Since then, mass shootings in the U.S. have become commonplace, and in 2017 alone, there were over 300 attacks, according to the Gun Violence Archive.

How Has Gun Control Policy Changed As A Result Of The 2017 Revolutions?

As a result of the 2017 uprisings, gun control policy in the U.S. has changed. Several states have now introduced legislation that would raise the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21 years old. In some states, like Colorado and California, the legislation would also impose a limit on the size of clips which a shooter can use.

One of the more significant changes that has occurred is that a greater number of people are now aware of the connection between mass shootings and mental illness. While the issue of gun control has mostly centered around preventing mass shootings, the stigma around mental illness has made it more difficult for those struggling with mental health issues to seek help. This, in turn, has made it easier for them to get their hands on a weapon.

How Has The National Conversation About Race And Gun Violence Evolved Since The 1911 Rebellion?

The national conversation about race and gun violence in the U.S. has changed a lot since the 1911 rebellion. Back then, when tensions between African Americans and white people in the state of Georgia threatened to boil over, the debate over firearms centered almost exclusively on the right to bear arms. The fact that so many people were killed during the rebellion and its aftermath made it a defining moment in American history. In the decades that followed, African Americans experienced a great deal of discrimination, and many states still wouldn’t give them the right to vote. As a result, their demands were more limited than those of today’s activists. They simply wanted to be able to vote.

In sharp contrast, today’s protesters are calling for systemic changes that would effectively eliminate racism from every aspect of society. One of the major manifestations of this evolution is a greater willingness of activists to engage in civil disobedience. In the years following the 1911 rebellion, armed conflict between African Americans and white people was an almost unimaginable concept. These days, it is routine for people of color to openly defy white supremacy through the use of nonviolent means.

Another significant difference between the two revolts is that today’s protesters are much more likely to be supported by a greater number of people in the mainstream. In the early part of this century, journalists at the time reported that several black communities in the U.S. were cut off from most national networks. While cable TV has made it possible for more people to get news from distant regions, it has also created the world’s largest echo chambers. As a result, many people today believe that the only good black person is a subservient one, and that praising black people will get you into trouble. This perception has made it easier for white people to support the agendas of powerful groups like the NRA.

The Importance Of Studying History

The debate over firearms and their regulation has revived interest in the 1911 rebellion and the “Hallsville Massacre,” as well. The historian Mary McAuliffe has noted that the events of 1911 “marked an inflection point in the history of the United States.” Not only did it lead to a limited reform in the right to vote, but it also “shifted the national conversation about race.”

McAuliffe argues that the key to understanding how far back a particular episode or issue in American history goes is by studying the broader historical context in which it occurred. In the case of the “Hallsville Massacre,” it is important to study what happened in Georgia in the years immediately following the Civil War. The state had originally sought to disenfranchise African Americans and prevent them from gaining power. However, with the passage of the 14th Amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves, and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the right to vote, many white Georgians found themselves working against their own interests.

As the historian Eric Foner has put it, the 14th and 15th Amendments were “a death knell for the Ku Klux Klan in the United States,” as “the nation’s first African American‐majority legislature would soon be seated and the Radical Republicans would control the White House.” The ramifications of this evolutionary moment were not only political but also cultural. By ending slavery and granting black people equal rights, the Civil War not only brought moral conviction to those who opposed the Confederacy, but it also catalyzed the rise of a new African American middle class.

To truly understand how far back this incident in American history reaches, it is necessary to examine the unique circumstances that led to the rebellion in the first place. One of the major grievances of the African Americans who led the revolt was that the state of Georgia had not sufficiently recompensed them for their service during the war. While the Confederate government had, in fact, provided some benefits, these were often overshadowed by the suffering experienced by the citizens of Georgia during the conflict.

With its rich agricultural lands and its position on the railroads which carried passengers and freight to and from the Atlantic Coast, Atlanta was a hub of activity during this time. Because of its strategic position, it was one of the primary targets of the Union Army. Not only did it have to endure repeated bombing raids and artillery barrages, but it also had to deal with the forced relocation of its residents as the military used the city for its own ends. The Union Army carried out “military government” in the city for much of the war, and it was not until the end that the residents were allowed to go home.

In the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, the need for reconstruction swept across the country. The North had lost more people and property in the conflict, and it was struggling with the task of bringing the South to heel. For their part, the Southern leaders knew that if they wanted to ensure social stability and economic growth, they had to give black people an equal share in these benefits. As a result, the need for gun control in the state of Georgia was effectively answered by the rebellion led by a group of African Americans.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!